Dimension-first comparison · xTool P2S vs S1
xTool P2S vs S1: Space, Weight, and Work-Area Comparison
The S1 body is 9.25 inches narrower and 3.07 inches shallower than the P2S, with about 32.8% less calculated body area. Its published machine weight is 55.1 lb lower. The P2S has a larger published rectangular work area, but the technologies and capabilities are not equivalent.
- Official xTool sources
- Original calculations
- Reviewed 2026-09-09
- No hands-on performance claim
Start with the documented envelope.
39.37 × 25.16 × 10.55 in
99.2 lb
30.12 × 22.09 × 7.20 in
44.1 lb without riser
S1 is 9.25 in narrower
3.07 in shallower
S1 is about 32.8% smaller
Calculated width × depth
What changes in a constrained room
- The P2S body occupies about 0.639 m²; the S1 body occupies about 0.429 m².
- A 24-inch-deep top is shallower than P2S but leaves 1.91 in beyond the S1 body.
- The published P2S work area is 600 × 305 mm; the S1 40 W work area is 498 × 319 mm.
- The P2S general shipping package remains unresolved; do not compare delivery using body dimensions.
Arithmetic can expose a conflict or tight margin. It cannot establish support suitability, delivery handling, operating clearance, ventilation, electrical capacity, fire protection or code compliance.
Turn the comparison into a measured plan.
- Screen the closed bodies against the same measured surface and room orientation.
- Compare package evidence and route geometry separately.
- Add the required riser, conveyor, exhaust, and cooling arrangements for the exact configuration.
- Use manufacturer guidance to compare process capability; this page does not infer it from wattage.
Compare every supported profile
Enter one surface and room zone, then order candidates by evidence and fit rather than price.
Full reportCheck the featured model
Carry the model into delivery, surface, room, exhaust and utility checks.
Complete handoffLaser-room setup checklist
Carry the calculation into delivery, operating space, air path, utilities, materials, and confirmations.
Total costxTool setup-cost builder
Record machine, air-management, attachment, support, site, shipping, tax, and material costs.
Launch alternativeX1 vs P2S vs P3 tracker
Separate published X1 facts from purchase and room details that remain unknown.
Purchase researchxTool buying options
Compare official listings after the room and configuration questions are visible.
Keep these questions unresolved until confirmed.
- The cited P2S sources show a small 305-to-308 mm work-area depth discrepancy; the profile uses the current recorded 305 mm figure.
- Neither profile supplies a complete numeric operating-clearance envelope.
- The machines use different laser technologies, so physical size alone cannot select the product.
LaserRoomReady has not physically tested the featured machines. It compares cited room-planning evidence and original calculations only.
Direct answers, with the boundary intact.
Which is easier to place on a 24-inch-deep surface?
The S1 body is 22.09 inches deep. The P2S body is 25.16 inches deep and exceeds a 24-inch top before operating allowances.
Does smaller mean less capable?
No conclusion about capability follows from body area. Use the current product documentation and intended materials and workflow for that decision.
Manufacturer sources used on this page
Continue only after the room questions are visible.
These merchant links are clearly labeled. LaserRoomReady may earn a commission at no extra cost to you if you buy through one. Compensation does not change the calculations or display order.
xTool P2S 55W CO₂
39.4 × 25.2 × 10.6 in / 1000 × 639 × 268 mm. Read the evidence and unresolved fields before purchase.
Check today's xTool P2S 55W CO₂ price and options at xTool ↗xTool S1 40W
30.1 × 22.1 × 7.2 in without riser. Read the evidence and unresolved fields before purchase.
Check today's xTool S1 40W price and options at xTool ↗